#Crazy torchlight 2 builds how to#

Building a case for God from the universe is hard enough with the universe to look at - now you expect someone to build a case for where God came from or why God exists without being able to see Him or His circumstances or who knows what. We have nothing to work with in regards to that question. It is not so reasonable to question 'where God came from' because we can't see God in the traditional sense - and see where the evidence might take us. The evidence for God is the universe - what other evidence would I have? You say, 'no, that's life' - what in the hell is that supposed to mean? If the universe is a mystery to you then it needs an explanation (so if you're honest). So since you've failed to explain my question above, perhaps you could explain why the universe not only needs an explanation, but needs 'God' as one, and God on the other hand somehow doesn't need an explanation at all? You've just asserted that it's 'all around you', no, that's life. Just made empty statements and promoted vainness.Д®videnceVsFaith Wrote:Nor have you given evidence for God. You haven't explained how you can get a hope. So how have you explained that you can't get a hope and reason for existing without God? You haven't. Belief in God results from seeing this existence (all the evidence in the world) and answering the question of where it came from.

(Septemat 11:21 am)ecolox Wrote: Hope and a reason for existing - results in a different lifestyle. (Septemat 6:44 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: (Septemat 10:54 am)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: Give me one example of something that is positive that belief in God can give you, that atheism can't, that isn't merely the placebo effect - and that can actually be backed up by evidence. Perhaps everything will be questioned by you, but few things will be answered. a stupid question) - so, do so at your own risk. A question is not innately reasonable (e.g. And you can ask as many questions as you want. (One method is somewhat better than the other ) Everything will be questioned, even your god.ДЄll of those explanations have nothing to do with the question of why we are here. First question then answer with either assumptions or scientific observation. It's never reasonable to stop trying to explain things.

#Crazy torchlight 2 builds how to#

I can see the world and how it works, hence the fact that it is reasonable to ask questions about the universe that have answers that transcend it.ДЄce Wrote:We can explain how to split atoms, how to convert energy on a gigantic scale, to alter DNA in animals and even the formation of not just our planet but the solar system and galaxies. As things are, it is not reasonable to ask that question. If I could see God plainly and apply similar techniques then I'm sure I could answer your question. God is what I end up with upon 'reverse engineering' the universe - inductive reasoning, it's the best I can do. If everything has a purpose then whats the purpose of god? I think it's reasonable to stop trying to explain things once we have explained the universe. (Septemat 10:25 am)Ace Wrote: (Septemat 3:33 pm)ecolox Wrote: We can't explain the inside of the universe, much less the outside.